The reader may or may not know the name Israel Folau. I certainly didn’t until a few days ago. He’s a professional rugby player who’s suddenly been deemed unfit for employment. His violation? He posted a message for adulterers, homosexuals, thieves, atheists and the like through his Instagram account: repent, believe in Christ and be saved from Hellfire. If the reader is well versed in the modern socio-political scene, he will accurately presume that such a message wasn’t well received by the militant-homo-lobby and its vanguard. However, what if I were to tell you, dear reader, that another unexpected group also proceeded to rebuke Folau for simply communicating Biblical Truth – namely, conservatives – would you believe me?Continue reading
“Politics is downstream from culture.” It is a pithy saying attributed to the late Andrew Breitbart. If this is true, one has to wonder what influences culture so that it eventually influences politics. Continue reading
The public boycotts have been mounting, justifiably and encouragingly so, against organizations that insist on supporting immoral thought and behavior either directly or indirectly.
First it was Target, after they announced that their bathrooms and fitting rooms would be open to “transgender” persons. Then it was Shakespeare in the Park, depicting what a Trump assassination would look like if interpreted along the lines of Julius Caesar. It has culminated with the NFL and its insistence that players be allowed to disrespect our national anthem and Old Glory. Continue reading
Can anyone explain what a right is? I suggest we disallow any further activism ensuring any other special interest groups achieve the “rights” they continue to demand, until someone properly defines the meaning of the word.
Why does the reader think that most will not bother to ask the question or to define the term? Please remember that groups such as militant homosexuals and abortion-crazy feminists have used the expression inaccurately in order to achieve special privileges and consideration, not true equality (which they already had, under the law, to begin with). The very reason these demagogues do not bother to explain the term is because the definition contradicts the ends they seek. Continue reading